Datos ficticios solo para vista previa; no es un pedido pagado.
Детали аудита
Observed brand mention rate
24%
Observado solo en esta prueba seleccionada.
Tasa de mención de competidores
41%
Observado solo en esta prueba seleccionada.
Competidor principal
Brewline
Observado solo en esta prueba seleccionada.
Posición media de la marca
3,2
Observado solo en esta prueba seleccionada.
Краткое резюме
This sample report checks selected buyer-intent prompts for a fictional coffee brand. Northwind Coffee is mentioned in a minority of sampled answer slots and is rarely recommended first.
Brewline is the strongest observed competitor because it appears in comparison and local list prompts more consistently.
The repeated citation pattern points to review directories and comparison articles, which means Northwind's biggest opportunity is to create answer-first category content and improve third-party proof.
Тест покупательских prompt
This sample checks selected prompts and selected engines, not the whole internet.
Бренд vs конкуренты
Observed brand mention rate
24%
Observado solo en esta prueba seleccionada.
Tasa de mención de competidores
41%
Observado solo en esta prueba seleccionada.
Competidor principal
Brewline
Observado solo en esta prueba seleccionada.
Posición media de la marca
3,2
Observado solo en esta prueba seleccionada.
Brewline
: High
38%
Wins from comparison articles and list placements.
Peak Roast
: Medium
22%
Strong local review signals, weaker owned content.
Покрытие prompt
Prompt 1
Диагноз
Competitors have stronger third-party list placements for this category.
Рекомендуемое действие
Create a buyer-facing category page and pursue inclusion in local comparison lists.
Цитирования/домены источников: local-coffee-guide.example, reviews.example
Prompt 2
Диагноз
The brand appears, but the answer lacks proof points and service detail.
Рекомендуемое действие
Add concise office coffee proof, delivery details and customer evidence near the top of the page.
Цитирования/домены источников: northwind.example
Prompt 3
Диагноз
Answers lack direct owned comparison data and lean on third-party summaries.
Рекомендуемое действие
Publish a fair comparison page that addresses audience fit, pricing signals and service differences.
Цитирования/домены источников: comparison.example
Prompt 4
Диагноз
Sustainability claims are not packaged as answer-ready content.
Рекомендуемое действие
Create a sustainability proof page with direct claims, certifications and sourcing details.
Цитирования/домены источников: sustainable-products.example
Карта цитирований
The owned page is cited when the brand is named, but it does not answer buyer prompts directly.
Improve entity facts, service proof and direct category answers.
AI systems repeatedly use this source when recommending local options.
Pursue inclusion or publish a stronger owned comparison resource.
Directory signals help answer systems choose shortlist candidates.
Claim and refresh profile facts, categories and links to service pages.
Диагноз
The site explains the brand, but it does not answer high-intent category questions in a concise source page.
Create a category page that answers the buyer question in the first 100 words.
Comparison articles and directories mention competitors more often than Northwind Coffee.
Prioritize inclusion in relevant directories and comparison pages.
Рекомендуемый план действий
Competitors were mentioned in category prompts while the brand lacked a page answering the query directly.
Пример: Create a page targeting 'best sustainable office coffee in Austin' with a direct answer, proof points and service details.
Versus prompts lack direct comparison evidence and lean on competitor-friendly third-party pages.
Пример: Compare Northwind Coffee and Brewline by delivery area, office plan fit, sourcing and customer proof.
Directory pages are already used as source material in recommendation prompts.
Пример: Claim the profile, align categories and add links to office coffee and sustainability pages.
Техническая готовность AEO/GEO
The sample site is crawlable, but answer engines need clearer entity signals, concise buyer answers and better structured proof.
The sample site can be fetched by standard crawlers.
Keep robots.txt open for desired AI crawlers.
Organization and Service schema are incomplete.
Add Organization and Service schema with sameAs profiles.
Buyer questions are answered too late in the page.
Lead service pages with concise answers and proof points.
Методология и ограничения